Latest Articles
View MoreKosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28 In a landmark case, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that municipal parkland can be acquired through adverse possession where statutory requirements are met. The Court rejected arguments that judges should create common law immunities for such lands, holding that only the…
Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28 In a landmark case, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that municipal parkland can be acquired through adverse possession where statutory requirements are met. The Court rejected arguments that judges should create common law immunities for such lands, holding that only the…
Real estate practitioners should take note of a recent Ontario Superior Court decision that underscores the stringent disclosure obligations required when obtaining a certificate of pending litigation (CPL) without notice. In 4291425 Canada Inc. v. Scot-Smith et al, Justice Kaufman discharged a CPL that had been registered against a residential…
Real estate lawyers who draft mortgage documents should take note of a recent Ontario Superior Court decision that provides important guidance on what fees and charges can be imposed on borrowers in default. In TMSSD Inc. v. Ojeikere, 2025 ONSC 5245, Justice Kurz granted summary judgment to a mortgage lender…
Tillger v. Figliano, 2025 ONSC 4990, offers transactional real estate lawyers important insights into the risks that arise when family members transfer substantial funds without proper documentation, particularly when those funds are used to purchase real property. This decision underscores the critical importance of clear written agreements and serves as…
Featured Articles
Key Lessons from 1396929 Ontario Inc. v. Valladares for Transactional Lawyers 1396929 Ontario Inc. v. Valladares, 2025 ONCA 513 The Ontario Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Valladares serves as an important reminder for real estate practitioners about the potential pitfalls in mortgage enforcement proceedings, particularly when dealing with vulnerable…
The Ontario Superior Court’s recent decision in Ahmad v. Ain, 2025 ONSC 4017, serves as a stark reminder that firm, unconditional real estate agreements mean exactly what they say. For transactional lawyers, this case offers valuable insights into damages calculations, mitigation obligations, and the limits of accommodation in real estate…
A recent Ontario Superior Court decision demonstrates how the doctrine of equitable subrogation can rescue lenders from solicitor misconduct—and what transactional lawyers need to know to protect their clients. The Ontario Superior Court’s recent decision in Bank of Montreal v. Hossain, 2025 ONSC 3950, serves as a stark reminder of…
A recent Ontario Superior Court decision offers important reminders about the risks of informal property arrangements and the misuse of powers of attorney in real estate transactions. The recent decision in Harris v. Melo, 2025 ONSC 4152, serves as a cautionary tale for real estate practitioners about the dangers that…